Against Professional Philosophy

A Co-Authored Anarcho-Philosophical Diary

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Diary
  • Related Cool Stuff
  • Real Philosophy
  • About Us

Category: Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts

Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksMarch 10, 2026

(IEP, 2026)  You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy 1. Introduction Professional academic Analytic philosophy is … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend It: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerMarch 8, 2026

(Murphy, 2021) In “The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend it,” Robert Hanna argues that The Great Divide between Analytic philosophy and Continental philosophy is essentially an artifact of the social-institutional structure of the professional academy in the latter half of the 20th century and the first three decades of the 21st century, and if … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksMarch 8, 2026

(Dietterich Labs, 2019) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism 1. The Dogma Stated The physicists … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerMarch 1, 2026

(Russell, 1912/2009) In “The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem,” Robert Hanna formulates a list of the eleven fundamental problems of philosophy, then identifies one of them–the problem of rational anthropology: what is the nature, meaning or purpose, and value of individual and collective rational human existence in a … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksMarch 1, 2026

(Carreau, 2015) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma 1. Introduction In physics, it is commonly … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Can Philosophers Change Their Minds? A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerFebruary 22, 2026

(Williams, 2021) In “Can Philosophers Change Their Minds” Robert Hanna argues that as many as 99% of all contemporary professional academic philosophers, after they’ve completed their PhD dissertations, as much as 99% of the time don’t read anything outside their AOS, as much as 99% of the time don’t work on anything outside their AOS, … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Professional Academic Philosophy Lets Stand.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksFebruary 22, 2026

(Physics Explained, 2025) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Academic Professional Philosophy Lets … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Philosophia Longa, Vita Brevis: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerFebruary 15, 2026

“The Death of Socrates by Means of the APA,” by Q (APP, 2013a), after “The Death of Socrates,” by Jacques-Louis David (1787) In “Philosophia Longa, Vita Brevis,” Robert Hanna correspondingly argues that philosophia longa, vita brevis. That neologized Latin aphorism means: “philosophy is long, life is short.” Of course, Hanna riffing on the classical aphorism … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Burnt Book and  Black Hole Paradox: Why Susskind’s Information Paradox is Nonsense.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksFebruary 15, 2026

(Musser, 2023) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. The Burnt Book and  Black Hole Paradox: Why Susskind’s Information Paradox is Nonsense Leonard Susskind loves to tell a story about … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Creativistic Philosophy: Exploring the Limits of Formalization, #9—Where am I Heading?

by Andreas KellerFebruary 8, 2026

(Mabel, 2007)[ii] PREVIOUS INSTALLMENTS #1: Introduction #2: From Astrology to “Artificial Intelligence” #3: Patterns and Algorithms #4: Extending Algorithms #5: Enumeration and Incompleteness #6: Changing the Vantage Point #7: The Creativity Hypothesis #8: Data and Gödel Numbers You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Meta

  • Log in

Recent Posts

  • Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy.
  • The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend It: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism.
  • The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma.
  • Can Philosophers Change Their Minds? A Podcast.
  • Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Professional Academic Philosophy Lets Stand.
  • Philosophia Longa, Vita Brevis: A Podcast.
  • The Burnt Book and  Black Hole Paradox: Why Susskind’s Information Paradox is Nonsense.
  • Creativistic Philosophy: Exploring the Limits of Formalization, #9—Where am I Heading?

Categories

  • Conversations (20)
  • Essays (95)
  • Guest Essays (54)
  • Not An Edgy Essay (714)
  • Uncategorized (55)
We are here to provide a serious critique of contemporary professional philosophy, and to look towards the real philosophy of the future. Join us!

Send an email to The APP Circle.
Proudly powered by WordPress