On the Impossibility of Kantbots: A Podcast.

(Blitzway, 2026) The doctrine of strong artificial intelligence says that the operations of digital computing systems or digital technology can equal or exceed the achievements of conscious, rational human animals. In “On the Impossibility of Kantbots” Robert Hanna argues against the thesis of strong artificial intelligence by demonstrating the impossibility of what he calls Kantbots, … [continue reading]

Philosophical Rigor as Rigor Mortis, Or, How to Write a Publishable Paper Without Even Having to Think: A Podcast.

(Costa-Gavras, 1969) An earlier and exclusively online version of the essay, “Philosophical Rigor as Rigor Mortis, Or, How to Write a Publishable Paper Without Even Having to Think,” was written and published in 2015 by  the pseudonymous independent philosopher Z (aka, Robert Hanna), hence it appeared roughly five years prior to the “invasion of the … [continue reading]

Philosophy and “A Complete Appreciation of The Usual”: A Podcast.

“Whitehall From Charing Cross” (ca. 1899) by Herbert Menzies Marshall (Leithauser, 2021) In his essay “Philosophy and ‘A Complete Appreciation of the Usual’,” Robert Hanna begins with Henry James’s insightful remark that Anthony Trollope’s “great … [and] inestimable merit” as a novelist was “a complete appreciation of the usual.” By “the usual,” in this context, … [continue reading]

Why Read Science for Humans? 2: The Importance and Justification of The Explanatory Inversion Thesis. A Podcast.

(Hanna, 2024) In his book Science for Humans (Hanna, 2024) Robert Hanna presents and defends what he calls “the explanatory inversion thesis.” According to this thesis, all formal and natural mechanical systems are metaphysically dependent on and derivable from uncomputable, negentropic, irreversible, processual, purposive, self-organizing, and time-unidirectional or time-asymmetric organic systems, and not the other … [continue reading]

Is Kantianism The Ultimate Form of Philosophy? A Podcast.

Engraving of Kant at his desk (Birck, 18th century) In his essay “Kantian Futurism” (Hanna, 2024), Robert Hanna argued that all foreseeably future philosophy worldwide will be a series of positive or negative footnotes to Kant. Moreover, as regards negative footnotes, the 140-year-long anti-Kantian tradition of Analytic philosophy is in fact now coming to an … [continue reading]

Kant, Manifest Realism, Weak Transcendental Idealism, and The Refutation of Digital Idealism: A Podcast.

(Bramesco, 2021) In Robert Hanna’s view, Immanuel Kant’s transcendental idealism is most charitably and defensibly interpreted as a version of realistic idealism in two parts: first, manifest realism, and second, weak or counterfactual idealism. In “Kant, Manifest Realism, and The Refutation of Digital Idealism,” Hanna spells out manifest realism, demonstrates weak or counterfactual transcendental idealism, … [continue reading]

Why Read “Digital Technology for Humans”? A Podcast.

(Hanna, 2025) Digital ethics and AI ethics are of fundamental importance for humankind and its future. In his book, Digital Technology for Humans, Robert Hanna shows how specifically Kantian moral principles can be applied to the design, production, and implementation of digital technology, with a special focus on how these principles flow from the concept … [continue reading]

Why Androids Don’t Dream of Electric Sheep—Or Anything Else: A Podcast.

(Dick, 1968) Every animal sleeps, including non-rational, non-human animals; and during sleep, every animal dreams, although not constantly; but in any case, we rational human animals often fail to remember the contents of our  dreams upon waking. And even when we do remember the contents of our dreams, unless we immediately record them upon waking, … [continue reading]

The Refutation of Compatibilism and Soft Determinism, and a New Proof of Real Incompatibilistic Free Agency: A Podcast.

Marvin the Paranoid Android (GSD, 2026) So you think that you’re both naturally determined and a free agent, and also that this philosophical position, which combines “compatibilism” (i.e., the consistency of free will and universal natural determinism) and “soft determinism” (i.e., the conjunction of free will and universal natural determinism) is conceptually coherent? Wrong, wrong, … [continue reading]