Against Professional Philosophy

A Co-Authored Anarcho-Philosophical Diary

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Diary
  • Related Cool Stuff
  • Real Philosophy
  • About Us

Category: Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Kant, Williamson, and The Future of Analytic Philosophy: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerFebruary 8, 2026

 Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)  Timothy Williamson (1955-present) In “Kant, Williamson, and the Future of Analytic Philosophy,” Robert Hanna points out that it’s a truth not generally acknowledged, that all Anglo-American-&-European philosophy since Kant—i.e., since the end of the 18th century—is post-Kantian. This is of course trivially true, in that all Anglo-American-&-European philosophy since the end of … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

When Space and Time Dissolve: The Challenge to Mechanistic Thinking.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksFebruary 8, 2026

(Andersen, 2020) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download icon. When Space and Time Dissolve: The Challenge to Mechanistic Thinking 1. Introduction Classical mechanism, based in Newton’s physics and developed during … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Internal Structure of Reading and the Internal Structure of Philosophizing: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerFebruary 1, 2026

(Wikimedia Commons, 2026) Literacy emerged in Sumeria roughly 5500 years ago, but the emergence of philosophy in ancient Greece roughly 2500 years ago seems to have been closely bound up with the emergence of the first alphabetic writing-&-reading system there in the 8th century BCE (Rayner et al., 2012: ch. 2). Certainly, in the 6th … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Why 1=.999… and ~ (1=.999…) are Both True! An Argument for the Inconsistency of the Reals, #2.

by Joseph Wayne Smith, Saxon J. Smith, and N. StocksFebruary 1, 2026

(Sci Am, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The Easy Part: Why 1=0.999 … 3. The Hard Part: Why ~ (1=0.999 …) is True as Well 4. Compatibility with the Standard Real Number Axioms 5. The Archimedean Principle Objection 6. A Tangent: Refuting Cantor’s Diagonal Argument 7. Conclusion The essay below has been published … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Creativistic Philosophy: Exploring the Limits of Formalization, #8 —Data and Gödel Numbers.

by Andreas KellerJanuary 25, 2026

(Revoy, 2025)[ii] PREVIOUS INSTALLMENTS #1: Introduction #2: From Astrology to “Artificial Intelligence” #3: Patterns and Algorithms #4: Extending Algorithms #5: Enumeration and Incompleteness #6: Changing the Vantage Point #7: The Creativity Hypothesis You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

What Good is Philosophy? My Answer. –A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJanuary 25, 2026

(Kyiv Mohyla Academy, 2023) In “What Good is Philosophy? My Answer.,” inspired by the title of an international conference in 2023, Robert Hanna attempts to provide an answer to the conference’s titular question himself. Now, like most philosophical questions, the question, “what good is philosophy?” is in fact a complex question that should be decomposed … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Why 1=.999… and ~ (1=.999…) are Both True! An Argument for the Inconsistency of the Reals, #1.

by Joseph Wayne Smith, Saxon J. Smith, and N. StocksJanuary 25, 2026

(Sci Am, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The Easy Part: Why 1=0.999 … 3. The Hard Part: Why ~ (1=0.999 …) is True as Well 4. Compatibility with the Standard Real Number Axioms 5. The Archimedean Principle Objection 6. A Tangent: Refuting Cantor’s Diagonal Argument 7. Conclusion The essay below will be published … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Kantian Futurism: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJanuary 18, 2026

Kant Futurized (Quintessential Mind, 2023) The future of philosophy and the future of humankind-in-the-world are intimately related, not only (i) in the obvious sense that all philosophers are “human, all-too-human” animals—i.e., members of the biological species Homo sapiens, and also finite, fallible, and thoroughly normative imperfect in every other way too—hence the natural fate of … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Anti-Reductionist  Philosophy of Science Against Mechanism, #6.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJanuary 18, 2026

(Murray, 2024) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Cronin-Walker Assembly Theory and the Anti-Reductionist Turn 3. Physics is Not Causally Closed: Nicolas Gisin’s Anti-Mechanism 4. Barbara Drossel’s Anti-Reductionism 5. Donald Hoffman’s Case Against Reality: There are No Brains 6. Colin McGinn’s Basic Structures of Reality: A Philosophical Analysis of Physics-Based Metaphysics and Structural Realism 7. … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Caveat Lector: From Wittgenstein to The Philosophy of Reading–A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJanuary 11, 2026

“Girl with a Book,” by Alexander Deineka  (1934) In “Caveat Lector: From Wittgenstein to The Philosophy of Reading,” Robert Hanna explores, against the grain of Analytic philosophy’s general avoidance of the fact or phenomenon of reading, and starting out with Wittgenstein’s compact sub-investigation in Philosophical Investigations into “the part the word [‘reading’] plays in our … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Meta

  • Log in

Recent Posts

  • Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy.
  • The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend It: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism.
  • The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma.
  • Can Philosophers Change Their Minds? A Podcast.
  • Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Professional Academic Philosophy Lets Stand.
  • Philosophia Longa, Vita Brevis: A Podcast.
  • The Burnt Book and  Black Hole Paradox: Why Susskind’s Information Paradox is Nonsense.
  • Creativistic Philosophy: Exploring the Limits of Formalization, #9—Where am I Heading?

Categories

  • Conversations (20)
  • Essays (95)
  • Guest Essays (54)
  • Not An Edgy Essay (714)
  • Uncategorized (55)
We are here to provide a serious critique of contemporary professional philosophy, and to look towards the real philosophy of the future. Join us!

Send an email to The APP Circle.
Proudly powered by WordPress