Against Professional Philosophy

A Co-Authored Anarcho-Philosophical Diary

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Diary
  • Related Cool Stuff
  • Real Philosophy
  • About Us

Category: Conversations

Post navigation

← Older posts

Diagnosing Analytic Philosophy: A Conversation.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna, Jobst Landgrebe, and Barry SmithMay 11, 2025

This conversation between Robert Hanna, Jobst Landgrebe, and Barry Smith was recorded during May 2025. You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the cover and complete text of Robert Hanna’s book, The Fate of Analysis, by clicking on the Download tabs directly below. Against Professional Philosophy is a sub-project of the … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Is Professional Academic Philosophy in Crisis? A Conversation.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna, Aaron Simmons, and Joshua YenApril 27, 2025

This conversation between Robert Hanna, Aaron Simmons, and Joshua Yen was recorded during March 2025. You can also download and read or share a .pdf of Robert Hanna’s essay, “Six Studies in The Decline and Fall of Professional Academic Philosophy, And A Real and Relevant Alternative,” by clicking on the Download tab directly below. Against … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

“Rational Anthropology”: What’s in a Name? –Imagine a New Kind of Philosophy.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerMay 22, 2022

’Tis but thy name that is my enemy; Thou art thyself, though not a Montague. What’s Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot, Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part Belonging to a man. O, be some other name! What’s in a name? that which we call a rose By any other name would … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott, #5.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerOctober 12, 2021

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott is a series of conversations about fundamental philosophical ideas, problems, and topics, from A to Z. The aim of these conversations is to move us beyond the false dichotomy between Analytic philosophy and so-called “Continental” philosophy–as if there were no other relevant alternatives: but in fact, there is at … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott, #4.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerSeptember 13, 2021

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott is a series of conversations about fundamental philosophical ideas, problems, and topics, from A to Z. The aim of these conversations is to move us beyond the false dichotomy between Analytic philosophy and so-called “Continental” philosophy–as if there were no other relevant alternatives: but in fact, there is at … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott, #3.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerAugust 29, 2021

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott is a series of conversations about fundamental philosophical ideas, problems, and topics, from A to Z. The aim of these conversations is to move us beyond the false dichotomy between Analytic philosophy and so-called “Continental” philosophy–as if there were no other relevant alternatives: but in fact, there is at … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott, #2.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerAugust 15, 2021

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott is a series of conversations about fundamental philosophical ideas, problems, and topics, from A to Z. The aim of these conversations is to move us beyond the false dichotomy between Analytic philosophy and so-called “Continental” philosophy–as if there were no other relevant alternatives: but in fact, there is at … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott, #1.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerAugust 2, 2021

Philosophy Talks, With Bob And Scott is a series of conversations about fundamental philosophical ideas, problems, and topics, from A to Z. The aim of these conversations is to move us beyond the false dichotomy between Analytic philosophy and so-called “Continental” philosophy–as if there were no other relevant alternatives: but in fact, there is at … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

LONDON CALLING BACK, #7–Philosophy and Mental Health During The New Apocalypse.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna, Michelle Maiese and Otto PaansNovember 1, 2020

LONDON CALLING BACK, by Emre Kazim, is a series about philosophy, society, and politics, from a British and non-North-American point of view, emphasizing a new critical-dignitarian, edgy, and thoroughly push-backarian philosophical, social, and political ferment on the rise in London, recalling the heady days of politicized punk and The Clash. During the COVID-19 pandemic, LONDON CALLING … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Attacking A Person By Rejecting Their Beliefs: The Reverse Ad Hominem Fallacy.

A Conversation between Robert Hanna and Otto PaansAugust 17, 2020

RH: Last night between sleeps I was thinking about two of our recent posts—“Immanuel Kant—Racist and Colonialist?,”[i] and “Being Oppressed vs. Being Offended: Why A Real Dialogue About Racism is Still Far Away,”[ii]—in relation to each other. The Kant post criticizes ad hominem attacks on classical figures in the history of philosophy in the name … [continue reading]

Posted in Conversations

Post navigation

← Older posts

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Meta

  • Log in

Recent Posts

  • Minding the Body: A Podcast.
  • The Ark of Ends: Thoughts on Hanna’s “Not All Animals Are Equal.”
  • Metaphysics With a Human Face–Lectures on Kant’s “Critique of Pure Reason”: A Podcast.
  • Can Philosophers Change Their Minds?
  • Diagnosing Analytic Philosophy: A Conversation.
  • On Fundamental Philosophical Disagreements and How to Resolve Them.
  • Morality and The Human Condition: A Podcast.
  • Consciousness and the Natural Universe.
  • The Mind-Body Politic: A Podcast.
  • Is Professional Academic Philosophy in Crisis? A Conversation.

Categories

  • Conversations (20)
  • Essays (95)
  • Guest Essays (54)
  • Not An Edgy Essay (647)
  • Uncategorized (56)
We are here to provide a serious critique of contemporary professional philosophy, and to look towards the real philosophy of the future. Join us!

Email:
Proudly powered by WordPress