Trump, Truth, and Logic: A Podcast.

Logical Trumpism in action (Vinjamuri, 2026)

A.J. Ayer wrote Language, Truth, and Logic in order to tell the world about Logical Empiricism (Ayer, 1935/1952). The purpose of Robert Hanna’s essay, “Trump, Truth, and Logic,” is to tell the world about what he calls Logical Trumpism. To the extent that the Logical Empiricists held that the choice of a logic is inherently non-cognitive because it’s strictly determined by human self-interest, and that, as Rudolf Carnap famously put it, “in logic there are no morals,” then Logical Trumpism can be regarded as a reduction-to-absurdity of Logical Empiricism. It’s not that Logical Empiricism entails Logical Trumpism—we shouldn’t blame Carnap for that—but instead that Logical Empiricism allows for Logical Trumpism and doesn’t definitively rule it out. But the choice of a logic must be inherently rational and justified by good reasons. So, against Carnap and Logical Empiricism, and especially against Trump and  Logical Trumpism: in logic, there not only are are but must be some morals.


You can find an accessible but also fully detailed podcast on Hanna’s “Trump, Truth, and Logic,” created by Scott Heftler and other friends of Philosophy Without Borders, HERE.

And you can also download and read or share a .pdf of the full text of “Trump, Truth, and Logic” by clicking on the Download tab directly below.


Against Professional Philosophy is a sub-project of the online mega-project Philosophy Without Borders, which is home-based on Patreon here.

Please consider becoming a patron!