Against Professional Philosophy

A Co-Authored Anarcho-Philosophical Diary

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Diary
  • Related Cool Stuff
  • Real Philosophy
  • About Us

Category: Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Freedom, Teleology, and Rational Causation: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerAugust 3, 2025

The basic link between Kant’s metaphysics of free will and his theory of practical agency is his theory of teleology, i. e., his theory of ends or purposes. In the first part of his essay “Freedom, Teleology, and Rational Causation,” Robert Hanna show how Kant’s theory of natural teleology, or the directedness of organismic life—biological … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Algebraic Shadow of Change: On the Philosophical Failure of Distribution Theory, #2.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksAugust 3, 2025

(Robinson, 2014) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Distribution Theory 3. The Distributional Derivative: A Formal Trick 4. Pathologies and the Limits of Generalization 5. Constructivist and Finitist Concerns 6. Conclusion The essay below is being published in two installments; this one, the second and final installment, contains sections 4-6. But you can also download … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Sensibility First: How to Interpret Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy–A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJuly 27, 2025

Schulting, D. (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. In the practical realm just as in the theoretical realm, everything comes down to human sensibility as an equally empirical and non-empirical primitive starting point that constitutively motivates, intentionally pervades, and intentionally structures our innately-specified yet also “human, all-too-human” capacities for theoretical and practical rationality, all … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Algebraic Shadow of Change: On the Philosophical Failure of Distribution Theory, #1.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJuly 27, 2025

(Robinson, 2014) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Distribution Theory 3. The Distributional Derivative: A Formal Trick 4. Pathologies and the Limits of Generalization 5. Constructivist and Finitist Concerns 6. Conclusion The essay below will be published in two installments; this one, the first, contains sections 1-3. But you can also download and read or … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Nostalgia and Memory.

by Mark PittengerJuly 20, 2025

(Crutcher, 2022) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download icon. Nostalgia and Memory And somewhere on the hillInside the past we hear the bellsCatching only parts of thoughtsAnd fragments of ourselvesTill … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Falling Dominoes of the Principle of Proof by Mathematical Induction, #3.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJuly 20, 2025

(Wikipedia, 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The Definition of Mathematical Induction 3. Wang’s Paradox and the Predicate “Small” 4. Edward Nelson’s Critique of Mathematical Induction 5. Mathematical Induction Meets Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems 6. Omega-Consistency and Its Role in Gödel’s Theorems 7. A Foundational Skepticism about Mathematical Induction 8. A Foundational Skepticism about Mathematical … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Kant’s B Deduction, Cognitive Organicism, the Limits of Natural Science, and the Autonomy of Consciousness: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJuly 13, 2025

Schulting, D. (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. Robert Hanna’s “Kant’s B Deduction, Cognitive Organicism, the Limits of Natural Science” explores the complexities of Kant’s B Deduction, proposing a “Bounded Scope Reading” where Categories apply exclusively to objects of experience, rather than the broader “Unbounded Scope Reading” that includes all objects of the senses. … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Falling Dominoes of the Principle of Proof by Mathematical Induction, #2.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJuly 13, 2025

(Wikipedia, 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The Definition of Mathematical Induction 3. Wang’s Paradox and the Predicate “Small” 4. Edward Nelson’s Critique of Mathematical Induction 5. Mathematical Induction Meets Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems 6. Omega-Consistency and Its Role in Gödel’s Theorems 7. A Foundational Skepticism about Mathematical Induction 8. A Foundational Skepticism about Mathematical … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Everybody is Already Here: A Neo-Kantian Solution to the Fermi Paradox.

by Robert HannaJuly 6, 2025

(Britannica, 2025) You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. Everybody is Already Here: A Neo-Kantian Solution to the Fermi Paradox According to a weak version of Immanuel Kant’s doctrine of … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Falling Dominoes of the Principle of Proof by Mathematical Induction, #1.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJuly 6, 2025

(Wikipedia, 2025) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. The Definition of Mathematical Induction 3. Wang’s Paradox and the Predicate “Small” 4. Edward Nelson’s Critique of Mathematical Induction 5. Mathematical Induction Meets Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems 6. Omega-Consistency and Its Role in Gödel’s Theorems 7. A Foundational Skepticism about Mathematical Induction 8. A Foundational Skepticism about Mathematical … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Meta

  • Log in

Recent Posts

  • Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy.
  • The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend It: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism.
  • The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma.
  • Can Philosophers Change Their Minds? A Podcast.
  • Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Professional Academic Philosophy Lets Stand.
  • Philosophia Longa, Vita Brevis: A Podcast.
  • The Burnt Book and  Black Hole Paradox: Why Susskind’s Information Paradox is Nonsense.
  • Creativistic Philosophy: Exploring the Limits of Formalization, #9—Where am I Heading?

Categories

  • Conversations (20)
  • Essays (95)
  • Guest Essays (54)
  • Not An Edgy Essay (714)
  • Uncategorized (55)
We are here to provide a serious critique of contemporary professional philosophy, and to look towards the real philosophy of the future. Join us!

Send an email to The APP Circle.
Proudly powered by WordPress