Against Professional Philosophy

A Co-Authored Anarcho-Philosophical Diary

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Diary
  • Related Cool Stuff
  • Real Philosophy
  • About Us

Category: Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Kantian Madness: Blind Intuitions, Essentially Rogue Objects, Nomological Deviance, and Categorial Anarchy–A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJune 29, 2025

Schulting, D. (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant says that “appearances can certainly be given in intuition without functions of the understanding” (A90/B122) and also that “intuition by no means requires the functions of thinking” (A91/B123). This opens up the real possibility of what Kant calls “blind … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

The Fermi Delusion: Why  Aliens Haven’t Called and Probably Never Will.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. Stocks and Robert HannaJune 29, 2025

(SETI Institute, 2025)  You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this essay by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. The Fermi Delusion: Why  Aliens Haven’t Called and Probably Never Will 1. Introduction The Fermi Paradox—why do we see no … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and the Gap in the B Deduction: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJune 22, 2025

Schulting, D. (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. Robert Hanna’s “Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and the Gap in the B Deduction” is about the nature of the relationship between (1) the doctrine of Non-Conceptualism about mental content, (2) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, and (3) the Transcendental Deduction of the Pure Concepts of the Understanding, or … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Mathematical Skepticism: Infinity and Real Numbers, #4.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJune 22, 2025

(Scientific American, 2023) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Chaitin and Borel 3. B.H. Slater 4. N.J. Wildberger 5. A Benacerraf-Inspired Critique of Real Numbers 6. Critique of Other Accounts of Real Numbers 7. Infinite Decimals and a Contradiction The following essay has been published in four installments; this installment, the fourth and final one, … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Kantian Non-Conceptualism: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJune 15, 2025

Schulting, D. (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. In “Kantian Non-Conceptualism,” Robert Hanna advances a rigorous defense of non-conceptual mental content, contending not only for its existence but for its foundational role in cognition. Against the dominant “Conceptualist” thesis—which holds that all mental content is structured by and accessible only through conceptual capacities—Hanna articulates and … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Mathematical Skepticism: Infinity and Real Numbers, #3.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJune 15, 2025

(Scientific American, 2023) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Chaitin and Borel 3. B.H. Slater 4. N.J. Wildberger 5. A Benacerraf-Inspired Critique of Real Numbers 6. Critique of Other Accounts of Real Numbers 7. Infinite Decimals and a Contradiction The following essay will be published in four installments; this installment, the third, contains sections 5 … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Announcing the Publication of Borderless Philosophy 8 (2025).

by BP Editorial TeamJune 8, 2025

You can also download and read or share a .pdf of the complete text of this announcement and Table of Contents by scrolling down to the bottom of this post and clicking on the Download tab. BORDERLESS PHILOSOPHY 8 (2025): TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Babette Babich, (Fordham University, USA), “Feyerabend’s ‘Science as Art’ and Aloïs … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Mathematical Skepticism: Infinity and Real Numbers, #2.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJune 8, 2025

(Scientific American, 2023) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Chaitin and Borel 3. B.H. Slater 4. N.J. Wildberger 5. A Benacerraf-Inspired Critique of Real Numbers 6. Critique of Other Accounts of Real Numbers 7. Infinite Decimals and a Contradiction The following essay will be published in four installments; this installment, the second, contains section 4. … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Kant and Nonconceptual Content: A Podcast.

by Robert Hanna and Scott HeftlerJune 2, 2025

Schulting, D. (ed.), Kantian Nonconceptualism. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. In “Kant and Nonconceptual Content,” Robert Hanna argues that Immanuel Kant is a significant early proponent of nonconceptual mental content—Kant’s notion of intuitional cognitive content is fundamentally equivalent to contemporary notions of nonconceptual content. Hanna contends that Kant’s famous dictum “intuitions without concepts are blind” should be understood as … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Mathematical Skepticism: Infinity and Real Numbers, #1.

by Joseph Wayne Smith and N. StocksJune 2, 2025

(Scientific American, 2023) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Chaitin and Borel 3. B.H. Slater 4. N.J. Wildberger 5. A Benacerraf-Inspired Critique of Real Numbers 6. Critique of Other Accounts of Real Numbers 7. Infinite Decimals and a Contradiction The following essay will be published in four installments; this installment, the first, contains sections 1-3. … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Meta

  • Log in

Recent Posts

  • Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy.
  • The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend It: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism.
  • The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma.
  • Can Philosophers Change Their Minds? A Podcast.
  • Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Professional Academic Philosophy Lets Stand.
  • Philosophia Longa, Vita Brevis: A Podcast.
  • The Burnt Book and  Black Hole Paradox: Why Susskind’s Information Paradox is Nonsense.
  • Creativistic Philosophy: Exploring the Limits of Formalization, #9—Where am I Heading?

Categories

  • Conversations (20)
  • Essays (95)
  • Guest Essays (54)
  • Not An Edgy Essay (714)
  • Uncategorized (55)
We are here to provide a serious critique of contemporary professional philosophy, and to look towards the real philosophy of the future. Join us!

Send an email to The APP Circle.
Proudly powered by WordPress