Against Professional Philosophy

A Co-Authored Anarcho-Philosophical Diary

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Home
  • Manifesto
  • Diary
  • Related Cool Stuff
  • Real Philosophy
  • About Us

Category: Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

The Double Infantilization of Professional Philosophy.

by ZMarch 6, 2016

I. KINDERGARTEN CLASSROOM RULES, by Ms Pratte. 1.  We listen and do. 2. We sit, stand, and walk properly. 3. We treat others the way we would like to treated. 4. We take turns and share. 5. We respect the personal space of others. 6. We do not leave the classroom without permission. 7. We … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Abusive Speech vs. Edgy Speech: Professional Philosophy’s Fanny Squeers and Professional Philosophy’s Lenny Bruce.

by ZFebruary 29, 2016

APP Editors’ Note: FS is a tenured full professor of philosophy at a state university somewhere in Texas, and Crispin Sartwell is a tenured associate professor of philosophy at Dickinson College. If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If both the facts and the … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

APP is Not Alone 6: “Add Your Own Egg” (The Point Re-Post)

by ZFebruary 22, 2016

The Point, 2016 APP Editors’ Note: Nakul Krishna is currently a Temporary Lecturer in Philosophy at Cambridge University. I was summoned to my tutor’s office a day or so after I’d arrived in Oxford. It was the last day of summer. A bumpkin from the tropics, I’d never seen an autumn before. I watched the … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

APP is Not Alone 5, Double Feature: 2. “Wanted: A Future for Philosophy” (CHE Re-Post).

by ZFebruary 15, 2016

Chronicle of Higher Education, July 16, 2014 How goes it with the institution of philosophy? Consider the situation of “Jeremy,” a Ph.D. student in the graduate program at the University of North Texas. As a second-year student, he has a teaching fellowship. This means that in addition to taking nine credit hours of graduate coursework, … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

APP is Not Alone 5, Double Feature: 1. “A New Philosophy for the 21st Century” (CHE Re-Post).

by ZFebruary 15, 2016

Chronicle of Higher Education. December 11, 2011 We have devoted our lives to philosophy. We want the field to survive and, if possible, prosper. But it is increasingly doubtful that academic philosophy can thrive in an era of declining budgets, soaring debts, antipathy to tax increases, and new technologies such as distance education. Of course, … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

“I Sure Don’t Need to Read This”: One Way of Dismissing APP.

by ZFebruary 8, 2016

“I’m afraid I don’t like your manner,” he said, using the edge of his voice. “I’ve had complaints about it,” I said. “But nothing seems to do any good.” –Philip Marlowe* *In R. Chandler, Farewell My Lovely (New York: First Vintage Crime/Black Lizard, 1992), p. 51. APP Editors’ note: Y’All is a tenured full professor … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

APP is Not Alone 4: “The Fragmentation of Philosophy, The Road to Reintegration” (AC.EDU Re-Post)

by ZFebruary 1, 2016

Münster Lecture, Universität Münster, November 2013. Forthcoming soon in E.M. Jung and J. Göhner (eds.), Susan Haack: Reintegrating Philosophy (Springer Verlag), and also posted on Academia.edu. … every fact leads to every other …. . Only men do not yet see how, always. And your business is to make plainer the way from some one … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

“Failed Academics”: Schopenhauer, Peirce, and the (D)evolution of University Philosophy.

by L_EJanuary 29, 2016

1. The relationship between philosophy and academia is tricky, and sometimes even tragic. For individuals living in the 21st century, the standard path towards a “quality” education is to enroll in universities. Those among us who are deeply interested in philosophy are naturally led to philosophy departments, and accordingly, we spend a great deal of … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

APP is Not Alone 3: “The Ph.D. Octopus” (Harvard Monthly Re-Post)

by ZJanuary 25, 2016

Harvard Monthly, 1903 Some years ago we had at our Harvard Graduate School a very brilliant student of Philosophy, who, after leaving us and supporting himself by literary labor for three years, received an appointment to teach English Literature at a sister-institution of learning. The governors of this institution, however, had no sooner communicated the … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Philosoflicks 3: On the Metaphysics of Puppets.

by ZJanuary 21, 2016

WHAT IS A PHILOSOFLICK? In “Let’s Make More Movies,” the epistemological anarchist Paul Feyerabend wrote this: The separation of subjects that is such a pronounced characteristic of modern philosophy is … not altogether undesirable. It is a step on the way to a more satisfactory type of myth. What is needed to proceed further is … [continue reading]

Posted in Not An Edgy Essay

Post navigation

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Archives

  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Meta

  • Log in

Recent Posts

  • Russell’s Paradox and the Ontological Filter: Toward a Consistency-Based Collection Theory.
  • Il Faut Cultiver Notre Jardin: How and Why We Must Cultivate Our Garden. A Podcast.
  • The Integration Illusion: Why Calculus’s Greatest Trick is a House of Cards.
  • Radical Logical Skepticism: The Unprovability Paradox as Total Underminer of Professional Academic Analytic Philosophy.
  • The Analytic-Continental Divide, and How to Transcend It: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #2: On the Energy–Time Uncertainty and the Impossibility of Sharp Realism.
  • The Eleven Fundamental Problems of Philosophy and How to Solve The Hyper-Fundamental Problem: A Podcast.
  • Against the Physicists, #1: On the Non-Conservation of Energy in the Curved Einsteinian  Dogma.
  • Can Philosophers Change Their Minds? A Podcast.
  • Feynman’s Light Path Integral Mirage: Why “All Possible Paths” for Photons is a Mathematical Illusion That Professional Academic Philosophy Lets Stand.

Categories

  • Conversations (20)
  • Essays (95)
  • Guest Essays (54)
  • Not An Edgy Essay (717)
  • Uncategorized (55)
We are here to provide a serious critique of contemporary professional philosophy, and to look towards the real philosophy of the future. Join us!

Send an email to The APP Circle.
Proudly powered by WordPress